If Trump's visit to China in 2017 was a handshake at a high point in Sino-US relations, then the context is entirely different if he were to set foot on Chinese soil again today. The world has weathered the storms of trade frictions, the pandemic, and geopolitics, and Sino-US relations have also experienced five years of ups and downs. At this juncture, his arrival itself sends a signal: even amidst intense competition, the door to dialogue has never been closed.

The most striking aspect of this hypothetical visit is not the protocol or the number of agreements signed, but the efforts of the two major powers to find a way to coexist amidst competition. In today's Sino-US relationship, "decoupling" has proven unrealistic; the deep intertwining of supply chains, climate change, and artificial intelligence governance all force both sides to sit down and talk. Trump's unique "transactional diplomacy" style might be able to break through seemingly rigid issues and create a gap for pragmatic cooperation.

Of course, we are also aware that a single visit cannot resolve all structural contradictions. But as long as there is face-to-face communication and listening to each other's core concerns, conflict can be transformed into a controllable game. On such a day, the only conclusion is: cooperation benefits both sides, while confrontation harms both—this remains an irrefutable truth.  It is hoped that this trip today will lay a solid foundation for China-US relations over the next four years and beyond.

In March 2026, the registrations of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) in 14 major EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries exceeded 224,000 units, representing a year-on-year increase of 51%, and accounted for 22% of total new vehicle sales in that month; it is estimated that this proportion stood at 21.2% across the entire EU. In the first quarter of 2026, cumulative BEV registrations in EU countries exceeded 500,000 units, marking a 33.5% year-on-year increase compared with the same period in 2025. Year-to-date BEV registrations in the five major economies of Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Poland all recorded a year-on-year growth of over 40%. Among them, Italy's BEV market share rose from approximately 5% at the end of 2025 to 8.6% in March 2026, with registrations increasing by 65% year-on-year; driven by new incentive policies, one out of every four new vehicles sold in Germany in March was a BEV, driving a 42% year-on-year increase in year-to-date sales; in France, BEVs accounted for 28% of new vehicle sales in March, and benefited from the social leasing program, year-to-date sales have increased by nearly 50%. Nordic countries continue to maintain their leading position: BEVs accounted for 76.6% of new vehicle sales in Denmark in March, nearly 50% in Finland, and 98.4% in Norway.

Relevant institutions point out that the popularization of electric vehicles has significantly reduced Europe's dependence on imported oil, and based on current registration volume estimates, it can reduce oil demand by approximately 2 million barrels per year. This trend had already emerged before the Middle East situation fully affected market data, and purchasing behaviors of consumers and fleet operators are accelerating the adoption of electric vehicles.

It has been one week since BYD's unveiling of the second-generation Blade Battery and its flash charging stations. Over this period, numerous automotive enthusiasts have gained a certain understanding of BYD's latest technological advancements. However, as the discussion deepens around the second-generation Blade Battery and flash charging technology, several questions have emerged. These primarily concern whether ultra-fast charging may adversely affect battery health and whether such rapid charging could impose stress on the power grid.

The notion that fast charging negatively impacts battery longevity is not new; it dates back to the early proliferation of mobile phones in the 2000s. So, does fast charging genuinely affect battery life? Indeed, fast charging poses potential risks to battery durability, and such a conclusion is not unfounded if we consider the outcome without examining the underlying mechanism. Yet, it is worth delving deeper: Why does fast charging impair battery life, what are the fundamental causes, and how can such effects be mitigated?

Asserting that fast charging harms battery life is an oversimplified and somewhat irresponsible claim, as it bypasses the core mechanism and draws conclusions based on superficial logic. Fast charging operates on the principle of high voltage and high current. According to Joule’s Law, Q = I²Rt, an increase in current leads to substantial heat generation, consequently elevating battery temperature. Furthermore, the Arrhenius effect indicates that for every approximate 10°C rise in temperature, the rate of battery aging doubles.

What does this imply? Simply put, assuming an ideal charging temperature baseline of 25°C, if the battery temperature surges to 45°C during charging, the aging rate doubles. Should the temperature reach 60°C, the aging rate could accelerate to 5–6 times that under baseline conditions. Specific manifestations include abnormal thickening of the SEI膜, dissolution of cathode materials, and their subsequent deposition on the anode surface, among other degradation mechanisms. Therefore, the apparent effect of fast or flash charging on battery lifespan is fundamentally attributable to the direct impact of elevated temperatures. By effectively managing temperature, whether it is fast charging, supercharging, or BYD’s flash charging, these methods can be rendered non-detrimental to battery health.

Understanding the underlying principles of flash charging paves the way for viable solutions. BYD’s second-generation Blade Battery incorporates a "Lithium-Ion High-Speed Channel" and an "All-Climate Intelligent Thermal Management System," which collectively minimize heat generation and enhance heat dissipation efficiency and uniformity. As a result, flash charging exerts negligible impact on battery longevity. In essence, BYD employs advanced thermal management technology to rapidly dissipate heat, while the lithium-ion high-speed channel reduces heat generation. This dual approach—both reducing heat production and enhancing dissipation—effectively controls temperature.

That said, compared to technical showcases, I place greater trust in manufacturers’ warranty policies and commitments, which are concrete and binding. After all, not all consumers are deeply interested in technical specifics. It is precisely because of BYD’s confidence in its technology that the company has further strengthened its battery warranty policy. The "capacity retention rate" covered under the second-generation Blade Battery warranty has been increased by 2.5% overall, while the battery cells continue to enjoy a "lifetime warranty." This reflects the commitment and attitude embodied in the second-generation Blade Battery. Hence, I assert that the manufacturer’s warranty policy is the critical takeaway—BYD has demonstrated substantial sincerity with its second-generation Blade Battery.

        While the global mainstream battery energy density is struggling to climb within the range of 250 to 300 watt-hours per kilogram, a research result from China has pushed this figure to 700 watt-hours per kilogram. This is not a gradual improvement but a disruptive leap. The joint team from Nankai University, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Shanghai Space Power Research Institute published their findings in the journal Nature on February 26, 2026. They successfully broke into the "forbidden zone" of the electrolyte design with fluorine elements, completely replacing the "lithium-oxygen coordination" paradigm that has dominated the industry for decades with the "lithium-fluorine coordination".

The core of this breakthrough lies in overcoming the century-old problem of difficult solubility of lithium salts in fluorine-containing hydrocarbon solvents. Traditional electrolytes rely on oxygen-containing solvents, but the strong coordination between oxygen and lithium ions acts like an invisible lock, limiting the rate of charge transfer and causing performance degradation and energy density reaching a ceiling at low temperatures. Fluorine theoretically has a weaker coordination, which can accelerate ion migration, but its extremely low dielectric constant and weak Lewis basicity make it difficult to effectively solvate lithium ions thermodynamically, and it has long been regarded as an "unbreakable" obstacle by the international academic community. The Chinese team did not stop at theoretical taboos but instead used precise molecular engineering to regulate the electronic density and spatial steric hindrance of fluorine atoms, ultimately finding the key to unlock the lock.

The significance of this breakthrough lies in demonstrating the profound transformation of China's scientific and technological innovation model. In the past, our efforts in the battery field were mostly focused on optimizing the efficiency of existing routes, which was like accelerating on a fixed track. This research, however, dared to explore a different path outside the established system and challenged the "impossible" in fundamental science. This "taking a detour to overtake" courage stems from the long-term and systematic research investment mechanism at the national level. In recent years, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has established the "Original Exploration Program" and "Major Research Program", clearly supporting high-risk, disruptive, and non-consensus research, providing institutional guarantees and trial-and-error space for scientists to challenge "forbidden zones".

From an application perspective, this technology has opened up the imagination space in high-end fields such as new energy vehicles, embodied intelligent robots, and aerospace. Its characteristic of remaining stable at minus 50 degrees Celsius directly breaks through the geographical and environmental boundaries of lithium batteries. Currently, leading enterprises like Gansu High-tech have initiated pilot tests, and the industry chain is rapidly following suit. Although large-scale production still faces cost and process challenges, the feasibility of the technical path has been proven, and it is only a matter of time before it moves from the laboratory to industrialization.

While global battery giants are still fiercely competing on the lithium-oxygen coordination track, Chinese scientists chose to directly reshape the race. This quiet "breakthrough" is far more valuable than the mere refreshment of technical indicators. It proves to the world that true leadership does not lie in how followers strive to run, but in whether there is the courage to raise the flag in the uncharted territory. There are no eternal forbidden zones in scientific innovation; only unbroken stereotypes.